lindsay lohan says no to playboy

Playboy, NO. Free Nudity, Yes

Lindsay Lohan has turned down the offer of posing nude for Playboy magazine saying the nudes she did in the New York magazine spread were artistic.  Probably a really stupid decision on her part, I mean what does she have to lose? Most likely just the $700.000 worth of double sided sex toys for her and her teenage boyfriend Samantha Ronson.

The Sapphic-leaning star has turned down a $700,000 offer to do an eight-page topless spread in Playboy's 55th-anniversary issue this January. "If there's nudity, then the answer's no . . . She's not going down the [New York] magazine road again," Lohan's rep told Playboy's creative consultant.

We've all seen her bits and pieces, why not have it smoothed out in photoshop like the rest of the Playmates? You goofed Blohan!

Get this, rumor has it Lindsay wants to have a baby with Sam. A natural pregnancy, natural birth and is willing to ask an ex-boyfriend to help with the conseving. I don't beleive a single part of this story. Nice try tabs.

A source close to Lindsay tells the paper, "Lindsay is in a very happy place at the moment. She's been having deep discussions about a baby.

"She wants a natural birth and has spoken to Sam about getting one of her ex-boyfriend's to help out. They don't want to adopt."

Babies aren't a new Hollywood trend, they are real life human beings with real life needs. People just can't switch from rehab party life to "hey, why not have a baby like Nicole Ritchie?" "It's so Posh!". Go buy a gold fish and torure it instead of spawning more toxic waste.

Match made in heaven...

Source Source
Author: christin Posted: 9/8/2008
Tags: Lindsay Lohan  Samantha Ronson